Saturday, October 24, 2015
basic informaion
Monday, September 12, 2011
Medical robots today and tomorrow
We born, we live our lives and at the end - we die. That's the truth. However, the quality of our lives often correlates with our health. Generally, the healthier we are the more we can achieve - thus the happier we can be.
That's why health has always been an issue to deal with. Nowadays medicine has gone a very long way compared to the time of Hippocrates of Kos. Now humans are able to do very complicated surgeries, invent cures for various illnesses and so on. The question arises - can medicine go further and in what ways?
The answer on the first part of the question is "definitely". However the answers to the second part can differ. There are many notable fields which could change the course of medical history for example - stem cells. Still, I'm sure that the field of robotics and robotics-related fields such as medical bionics and biomechatronics will play a big role in medicine in near future.
Actually, many exciting things are happening in these fields right now. So, in this section of my site I will try to shed some light on questions about medical robots and robotics related fields in medicine now and in the future.
The surgery
Medical robots that can do surgeries sounds marvelous, right? All existing surgery robots on this day are actually cleverly made manipulators controlled by competent doctors. There are some issues with the level of Artificial Intelligence needed to do surgeries independently but that can be achieved some day.Nowadays, there are two fields where surgical robots are being developed and tested. One is telerobotics which enables a doctor to do a surgery at a distance. The other field is minimally invasive surgery - surgery done without making large cuts.
The da Vinci robot surgery system is one great example of robotics use for surgery purposes. More than thousand units are being used world-wide. Read more on robot surgery in general.
Robots in hospitals
Hospitals are a bit like factories. There are many mundane tasks. For example - carrying things around, moving samples from one apparatus to another, cleaning. There are also tasks that require some strength. For example - lifting and moving patients.I assume you got the point - there are many tasks which could be done by medical robots. There has been some development in this field - there are robots intended for laboratory uses, there are AGV's (Automated Guided Vehicle) intended for hospital use.
As far as I know most of these are in a testing stage. However, it is surely a doable task.
Therapeutic robots
Medical robots used in therapies. The idea behind this is quite similar to therapies with animals only robots are more predictable.Read more on therapeutic robots.Bionic prosthetics
This is a robotics-related field. The outcome can't actually be considered a robot but the disciplines included are quite similar - AI, electronics, mechanics and more. This field strives to develop robotic prostheses for humans.The great dream is that one day there will be bionic arms and bionic legs just as good and functional (or even better) as our natural limbs. The recent development in this field is quite astounding. Several companies operate in this field - Ossur, Otto Bock and Touch Bionics are a few among those I'm aware of.
Nano-robots
Maybe this will be possible in the future. The idea is to develop devices as small as a few nanometers, hence the name รข€“ nano-robots. These little devices could then be used in different mind-blowing ways. For example, to fix a broken bone or to deliver medication to the exact place needed or to exterminate cancer cells.The possibilities are limited only by imagination. By now, nano-robots are in research and development stage so it actually IS imagination.
I'm sure that you want more information about each of these topics. Don't worry, there will be separate articles on all of these topics and possibly on a few more. I'm working on it check out this site's for development from time to time!
Military robots
Cargo carriers
Search and rescue
Fire-fighting
Mine clearance
Surveillance and reconnaissance
Armed robots
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle
Unmanned Ground Vehicles
Unmanned Underwater Vehicle
Household Robots
Robotic vacuums
Other floor cleaners
Mobile webcams
Gutter cleaners
Lawn mowing
Pool cleaning
Litter robot
Friends
Idustrial Robot Application
Components
Application
- Arc welding
- Assembly
- Coating
- Deburring
- Die Casting
- Moulding
- Material handling
- Picking
- Palletizing
- Packaging
- Painting
- Spot welding
What to consider when choosing a robot? (At least)
Manufacturers.
Here is a list of most known industrial robot manufacturers:- ABB
- Adept Technology
- Asyst Technologies
- Brooks automation
- DENSO robotics
- Epson robots
- FANUC robotics
- Intelitek
- Kawasaki heavy industries
- KUKA Robotics
- Yaskawa-Motoman
- Nachi robotic systems
- Reis robotics
- Toshiba Machine
Basic Types of Robots
Types of robots
There are numerous ways how to define types of robots. As I have seen the possible divisions varies widely. The main reason of these differences is that different scholars tend to have different views on issues that should be taught under term "robotics".For example - most scholars that teach robotics usually focus mainly on industrial robots, neglecting service robots completely. Therefore when talking about types of robots they usually talk about types of industrial robots. There is a strong reason for this though - the vast majority of robotics engineers will have to deal mostly with industrial robotics.
Nevertheless, industrial robots are not the only ones. Therefore when dividing robots into types this division should be broad enough to include everything that can be understood as a robot.
There are two possible ways how this could be done. First, you can divide robots into types by their application and second - by the way they move (or doesn't). I acknowledge that there are other possible ways how to define various types of robots but in my opinion these two are the most relevant ones. Also, I prefer to use both these classifications together. This way two questions about a robot would be already answered - "What it does?" and "How it does its job?"
Types of robots by application
Nowadays, robots do a lot of different tasks in many fields. And this number of jobs entrusted to robots is growing steadily. That's why one of the best ways how to divide robots into types is a division by their application. There are:- Industrial robots
- Domestic or household robots
- Medical robots
- Service robots
- Military robots
- Entertainment robots
- Exploration robots
Now, as you can see there are examples that fit into more than one of these types. For example, there can be a deep see exploration robot that can gather some valuable information that can be used for military purposes.
Also, I have seen that a division into two types is used, accordingly - industrial and service robots. However, I can not see how a Mars exploration rover fits into one of these general types. Therefore I have used "service robots" in a narrower manner. In my version a term "service robots" serves as "others". This is basically a type where robots that don't fit into other types should fall in.
Types of robots by locomotion and kinematics
As you can understand, robot's application alone does not provide enough information when talking about a specific robot. For example an industrial robot - usually, when talking about industrial robots we think of stationary robots in a work cell that do a specific task. That's alright, but if there is an AVG (Automated Guided Vehicle) in a factory? It is also a robotic device working in an industrial environment. So, I propose to use both of these classifications together.So there are:
1. Stationary robots (including robotic arms with a global axis of movement)
1.1 Cartesian/Gantry robots (rectangular robot)
1.2 Cylindrical robots
1.3 Spherical robots (polar robots)
1.4 SCARA robots (RRP)
1.5 Articulated robots (robotic arms)
1.6 Parallel robots
2. Wheeled robots
2.1 Single wheel (ball) robots
2.2 Two-wheeled robots
2.3 Three and more wheel robots
3. Legged robots
3.1 Bipedal robots (humanoid robots)
3.2 Tripedal robots
3.3 quadrupedal robots
3.4 hexapod robots
3.5 other numbers of legs
4. Swimming robots
5. Flying robots
6. Mobile spherical robots (robotic balls)
7. Others
Wireless Accelerometer Controlled Robot
If the user wants to move the robot forward he can lean the steering plate forward and backward for reverse. To turn left or right user need to turn the steering plate toward left or right respectively.
The major building blocks of this project are:
- Two Microcontroller Mother Boards with regulated power supply.
- 433MHz RF Transmitter and Receiver Modules.
- Accelerometer Sensor Module.
- Robot Vehicle with two PWM controlled DC Motors.
DTMF Controlled Wireless Robot
The mobile unit which is dedicated at the robot is interfaced with an intellectual device called Microcontroller so that it takes the responsibility of decoding the tones received and perform the corresponding predefined tasks such as move front or back, left or right etc.
The micro controller is also interfaced with few DC motors in order to move the robot in different directions. The ON and OFF of the DC motors depends on the direction it has to move which is the complete responsibility of the controller to take those intelligent decisions.
The major building blocks of this project are:-
- Regulated Power Supply
- GSM Modem/Phone
- Microcontroller based Control Unit
- Robot Mechanical Assembly
- DTMF Drivers
GSM (SMS) Controlled Wireless Robot
The mobile unit which is dedicated at the robot is interfaced with an intellectual device called Micro controller so that it takes the responsibility of reading the received commands in the form of SMS from the mobile unit and perform the corresponding predefined tasks such as move front or back, left or right etc. The micro controller is also interfaced with few DC motors in order to move the robot in different directions. The ON and OFF of the DC motors depends on the direction it has to move which is the complete responsibility of the controller to take those intelligent decisions.
The major building blocks of this project are:-
- Regulated Power Supply
- GSM Modem
- Microcontroller based Control Unit
- Robot
- Serial Communication Port(RS232)
Obstacle detection Robot with Ultrasonic Sensors
The robot consists of an 8-bit microcontroller to communicate with the sensor and takes any action depending upon the feedback received from the ultrasonic sensor. Here the micro controller part is to control the movement of the robot as well as to read the input from the sensor unit.
This also consists of few dc motors to rotate the wheels of the robot. The motor is rotated as per the direction in which the robot has to be moved, these kind of intelligent decisions are to be taken by the controller.
The major building blocks of this project are:-
- Regulated Power Supply
- Microcontroller based Control Unit
- Ultrasonic Sensor
- Geared DC motors
Robotics Projects
- Radio Frequency based remote controlled robot with wireless video camera mounted on it.
- Zigbee controlled Boat with wireless video and voice transmission with night vision capability.
- Autonomous Robot with artificial vision for obstacle detection.
- Voice operated robot with speaker identification technology.
- Accelerometer (Gyroscope) Controlled Robot. Accelerometer is MEMS based 3-axis tilt sensor that can sense the tilt in any of the 3-dimensions. The robot moment is controlled based on the tilt angle of the remote. No need to press any buttons for robot control.
- wireless room freshener spraying robot with video vision.
- Touch Screen Controlled intelligent robot.
- Mobile phone Bluetooth operated robot (works with any java enabled phone).
- DTMF based humanless Robotic boat control for ocean research application.
- Live Human being detection wireless remote controlled Robot. (Useful for detection of terrorists hiding inside buildings).
- GSM (SMS) Mobile Phone Controlled Intelligent Robot.
- Pick and place robot.
- Micro Electro Mechanical Sensor (MEMS) Accelerometer/Gyroscope based self-balancing robot.
- Servo motor controlled wireless video camera control system.
- Mobile phone controlled four-legged walking robot with speed and direction control.
- Radio Frequency (RF) Controlled Wireless Robot.
- Infrared Light tracing Robot (TV Remote controlled).
- Android mobile phone controlled bluetooth robot.
- Visible light follower Robot.
- Human-robot interface using robust speech recognition.
- Accelerometer (Gyroscope) Controlled Robot.
- DTMF based Mobile phone controlled Robot.
- Obstacle detection robot with mechanical sensing switches.
- Computer controlled Pic and Place Robot (wired or wireless).
- Line Follower Robot.
- Bomb detection Robot.
- Live Human detection and alerting Robot.
- Remote Controlled Land Rover.
- Smoke and LPG Gas detection robot with wireless control.
- PC Controlled Wired Robot.
- Wireless Voice and image transmission robot for surveillance system.
- PC Controlled Wireless Robot.
- Speech recognition robot with ultrasonic obstacle avoidance system.
- Obstacle detection Robot with Ultrasonic Sensors.
- Wall Follower Robot.
- Robot Controlled Wireless Audio-Video Streaming Camera.
- speech controlled wireless elevator system.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Wednesday, November 10, 2010
makes robo.
This new distribution branch allows for optimized logistics in Europe, ultimately leading to faster and cheaper shipping rates. This means all European fellows will be able to get more robot parts quicker. Let the European robots rise!
What should be the next location? Asia, South America perhaps? no gujarat is best...
Saturday, January 30, 2010
Robotics defination
Panasonic AW-005A Robot
The Panasonic AW-005A features high acceleration and deceleration and fast joint speed. All of the functions are on the teach pendant to reduce operator training time. The high performance digital servos with custom IC chips have reduced size and increased performance.
The high-speed 32bit RISC CPU operates at 4 times faster than the conventional 16 bit CPU. This gives the Panasonic AW-005A quicker, more accurate position feedback and quick sharp motions. With simultaneous editing and operation, it is even more flexible. The AW-005A can be floor or ceiling mounted and handle multiple computer communications options. This leads to more production and future expandability.
The Panasonic AW-005A features a 1019mm reach. The long-arm version, the Panasonic AW-005AL features a longer reach of 1335mm. Both models can handle a 5kg payloadRobot News Roundup

Here's a few interesting articles for your holiday-time perusal:
For $225k, you can swing by a department store in Japan and get a humanoid robot that looks like you!
Robot advances from around the world are featured in the EU Infrastructure article.
Wired's Gadget Lab shows off the hard-drive sculptures by Miguel Rivera, including a biped robot which uses 14 defunct laptop drives.
Unmanned flying vehicles are looking for a boost from research into hummingbird flight at University at Buffalo.
Advances in brain-machine interfacing is outlined in a recent article at GIGIOM.
A posting over on DIGG linked to this picture of R2 having lunch.
And we finish off with this Christmas video by rhyspross and the robot powers that be.
Cheers to all!
Talon, PackBot May Find Work at (or Under) the Border
QinetiQ Robots Deal Should Help Cut Transport Delays
Following a successful series of trials, QinetiQ is now working alongside key government partners to deliver a robot based service that is being used to help fight fires and support other major incidents – particularly if acetylene gas cylinders are involved which can become highly unstable – thereby protecting fire fighters plus helping minimize disruption to travelers by reducing resulting delays on major transport systems in and around London.
This initiative is funded jointly by Network Rail, the Highways Agency and Transport for London, in collaboration with the London Fire Brigade. The two year contract currently covers incidents within Greater London and surrounding counties but national coverage is possible with additional funding and extended call out times.
If acetylene gas cylinders are thought to be involved in a fire, the London Fire Brigade and others can request QinetiQ attend and deploy a range of remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) with all-terrain capabilities. These can then enter environments that could be potentially unsafe for fire fighters. Their cameras can identify whether any acetylene cylinders are present and, using thermal imaging, can gauge whether the cylinders are sufficiently cool for the Brigade to safely approach and remove them. The ROVs can also be used to gain access to premises and vehicles, target cooling onto cylinders, move debris and other items, or assess other potential risks.
Standard Fire & Rescue Service procedure is to impose an initial hazard zone of 200m for up to 24 hours if acetylene gas cylinders are present and have been involved in fire – which causes enormous disruption to transportation routes and local communities who have to be evacuated. This is because the risk of explosion following heating can remain long after the fire is extinguished and even after extensive cooling has been applied. Recent experience during the operational trials have shown that when QinetiQ’s robots are used at incidents, hazard zone restrictions can, on some occasions be reduced in as little as two hours from the time that they are in attendance.
“When fires break out near the railway they are often in circumstances where there is a suspicion that acetylene gas cylinders may be involved,” explained Simon Christoforato, QinetiQ’s business group manager for robotic systems. “In recent years there have been an increasing number of rail line-side fires and acetylene incidents across London, each causing massive disruption to passengers. During the 2008 trials QinetiQ responded to a total of 17 incidents and helped reduce the average period for the hazard zone to be in place from over 19 hours to less than three and has so far responded to more than 10 incidents under this contract in 2009.”
Assistant Commissioner for Operational Policy at London Fire Brigade, Jon Webb says the QinetiQ trial had played a key role in the Brigade’s successful efforts to reduce the impact of acetylene cylinder fires in the capital. “The successful trial of the ROVs, the improved provision of technical advice on the incident ground, together with a process of raising awareness and reinforcing understanding of the operational procedures to be applied at cylinder incidents have all been integral to the overall reduction in the average time that hazard zones are in place. In London we have also seen a reduction in the number of acetylene cylinder incidents overall thanks to our on-going campaign with local authorities to ensure the safe use, signage and storage of acetylene cylinders and to create a greater awareness of the dangers they bring when they are involved in a fire.”
Robin Gisby, Network Rail’s Director of Operations and Customer Service added the use of ROVs was good news for train users: “Anything we can do to reduce travel delays for passengers is high on our list of priorities but so is overall safety. The deployment of the ROVs will give us more options for faster resolution of incidents and hopefully lead to less disruption to train services.”
The Highways Agency is also carrying out a study that could see QinetiQ’s remotely operated vehicles modified for easier vehicle entry and potential use at a number of roadside incidents.
“All our efforts are designed to ensure that travellers are informed and can reliably make journeys on safe roads,” stated Mark Clark, responsible for Incident Management at The Highways Agency. “Roads are regularly affected by major incidents so anything we can do to deal with the problems and reduce delays for commuters is a good thing. We are working with QinetiQ to develop the robotic solution to meet our national needs going forward.”
“Hazard zones are necessary to deal with fires and other major incidents and can have a major knock-on effect on the road, bus and tube network causing disruption for motorists and our passengers,” concluded Richard Stephenson, Transport for London Director of Group Health, Safety and Environment. “Trials suggest this new equipment could have a real impact on cutting the length of time hazard zones are in place, while maintaining the safety of the emergency services and the travelling public.”
QinetiQ’s remotely operated vehicles are extensively used in Iraq and Afghanistan to combat improvised explosive devices and deal with roadside bombs but they are also ideal for a range of other dirty and dangerous tasks including dealing with hazardous materials and Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CRBN) incidents.
Background
QinetiQ’s response team can be called upon 24/7 and its special response vehicle, containing the three different ROVs with operators, will be dispatched. On arriving at the incident they immediately come under the command of the senior fire officer present who determines how and when they are deployed.
The three specialized vehicle types comprise: Talon, a small, highly maneuverable tracked vehicle, extensively used in Iraq for bomb disposal, that’s equipped with a video and thermal image cameras; Black Max which is similar in size and appearance to a quad bike which again has a video camera but also provides a remote hi‑pressure hose and water delivery capability; and the Brokk 90, a heavier duty mini-digger based vehicle designed to remove debris and gain access to vehicles or structures and therefore any cylinders.
In addition to this program London Fire Brigade is calling for improved control over the safe use, signage and storage of acetylene gas cylinders; and a greater awareness of the dangers when the cylinders are involved in fires and other incidents.
Typically the closure of a rail line can cost the network operator tens of thousands of pounds each hour the service is not operating in lost revenue and fines. The closure of other key transport routes or commercial facilities can equally mean significant losses in income and provision of services for the companies involved.NASA Concludes Robotics Tests For the Moon in Arizona
NASA has concluded two weeks of technology development tests on two of the agency’s prototype lunar rovers. The Desert RATS—or Research and Technology Studies—in the Arizona desert at Black Point Lava Flow allow NASA to analyze and refine technologies and procedures in extreme environments on Earth.
“These tests provide us with crucial information about how our cutting edge vehicles perform in field situations approximating the moon,” said Rob Ambrose, Human Robotic Systems project lead at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. “We learn from them, then go back home to refine the technology and plan the next focus of our research.”
The annual studies featured an intensive, simulated 14-day mission. Two crew members, an astronaut and a geologist, lived for more than 300 hours inside NASA’s prototype Lunar Electric Rover. The explorers scouted the area for features of geological interest, then donned spacesuits and conducted simulated moonwalks to collect samples. The crew also docked to a simulated habitat, drove the rover across difficult terrain, performed a rescue mission and made a four-day traverse across the lava.
Throughout the test, the crew provided updates via Twitter and posted pictures and video online.
Prior to the test, NASA’s K10 scout robot identified areas of interest for the crew to explore. NASA’s heavy-lift rover Tri-ATHLETE—or All-Terrain Hex-Legged Extra-Terrestrial Explorer—carried a habitat mockup to which the rover docked.
The Desert RATS tests have been held for more than a decade, as engineers from NASA centers work with representatives from industry and academia to determine what will be needed for human exploration of the moon and other destinations in the solar system. This year’s work built on the investigations of previous years and increased the scope and length of the tests.
Eight NASA centers were involved in the project. Desert RATS participants from outside NASA include the Smithsonian Institution in Washington; the United States Geological Survey in Flagstaff, Ariz.; Arizona State University in Tempe; University of Texas at El Paso; University of Colorado at Denver; Brown University in Providence, R.I.; the Mars Institute at Moffett Field, Calif.; and the Challenger Center for Space Science Education in Alexandria, Va.

